[interfacekit] Re: input_server and registrar

> For the registrar I don't see what to gain by trying to make it run under
> R5. In particular because we did neither implement all the private methods
> of BRoster, nor do I believe the semantics of the implemented ones is
> exactly the same. So, to really get it working with R5 a bit more than
> just a little work would need to be invested. It's simply not worth it, I
> believe.

It could be useful to test it with a working base, to begin with. Moreover, we 
could even release a replacement for R5.
Anyway, I guess the input server/app server are more important, and we could 
even replace them on the existing R5 installations. Wasn't "replace R5 piece by 
piece" the motto of OpenBeOS ? :=)

Other related posts: