[interfacekit] Re: async BView::FrameResized()
- From: Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:50:27 +0100
Hi,
I can confirm that on R5, the values passed to FrameResized() might not be
the same as the views current width/height as per Bounds().
Which means using Bounds() in FrameResized() is unreliable. Should we
duplicate this in Haiku (by using the values from the message), or should
we make FrameResized() synchronous again, provided that the actual fix for
#301 was not to call FrameResized() as long as the view as not attached to
a window? I would be in favour of the later, since I am sure a lot of code
calls Bounds() in FrameResized() (just look at our repo...) and it is quite
convenient to be able to rely on that.
Best regards,
-Stephan
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: async BView::FrameResized()
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [interfacekit] Re: async BView::FrameResized()
- From: Stephan Assmus
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] async BView::FrameResized()
- » [interfacekit] Re: async BView::FrameResized()
- » [interfacekit] Re: async BView::FrameResized()
- » [interfacekit] Re: async BView::FrameResized()
- » [interfacekit] Re: async BView::FrameResized()
- » [interfacekit] Re: async BView::FrameResized()
- [interfacekit] Re: async BView::FrameResized()
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [interfacekit] Re: async BView::FrameResized()
- From: Stephan Assmus