[interfacekit] Re: a BView flag ++
- From: Alan Westbrook <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 15:28:16 -0800
As far as I know, this flag causes the complete bview area to be included in the updateRect, rather
than just the area which has changed.
Alan
Adi Oanca wrote:
Hi, again!
OK, that's it!
Each one of us has a way of being, and if I will have a problem with
that, from now I will talk privately with that person. But my aim is to
cope with each one's way of being.
For what if matters now, I wish to apologize to Ingo and look for a
better cooperation in future.
So: I'M SORRY Ingo!
Now, I have a question( at with I don't want an easy answer :-) ) about
a BView flag, namely:
B_FULL_UPDATE_ON_RESIZE
Why is that needed?
Adi.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cauta-ti perechea pe http://dating.acasa.ro
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: a BView flag ++
- From: Adi Oanca
- References:
- [interfacekit] a BView flag ++
- From: Adi Oanca
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] a BView flag ++
- » [interfacekit] Re: a BView flag ++
- » [interfacekit] Re: a BView flag ++
- » [interfacekit] Re: a BView flag ++
- » [interfacekit] Re: a BView flag
Hi, again!
OK, that's it!
Each one of us has a way of being, and if I will have a problem with that, from now I will talk privately with that person. But my aim is to cope with each one's way of being.
For what if matters now, I wish to apologize to Ingo and look for a better cooperation in future.
So: I'M SORRY Ingo!
Now, I have a question( at with I don't want an easy answer :-) ) about a BView flag, namely:
B_FULL_UPDATE_ON_RESIZE
Why is that needed?
Adi.
--------------------------------------------------------------- Cauta-ti perechea pe http://dating.acasa.ro
- [interfacekit] Re: a BView flag ++
- From: Adi Oanca
- [interfacekit] a BView flag ++
- From: Adi Oanca