[interfacekit] Re: Support Kit Classes in the SK team repository
- From: DarkWyrm <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 12:28:10 -0400
>
>On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, DarkWyrm wrote:
>
>If you mean in app_kit/source/lib/support/src, then there is only a
>329 byte sized placeholder.
Oops. My mistake. :P
>Err, no, I just thought, we couldn't link against libbe as we define the
>same symbols as libbe, and I reckoned, that the linker wouldn't eat it.
>
>CU, Ingo
You're right about the linker complaining about them. We've run into that
type of problem before with implementing the regular classes. IIRC, Erik has
said we no longer are using namespaces to resolve symbol conflicts. Have you
considered looking into just using (slightly) modified class names, i.e.
OBOSApplication instead of BApplication, etc.? I've done similar tricks with
the prototypes' test applications which are a very skeletal version of
BApplication. That way, you can do a global replace on the string when you
have it to the point where you don't need libbe. It's just a thought - you
might have a different route in mind.
--DW
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Support Kit Classes in the SK team repository
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Support Kit Classes in the SK team repository
- » [interfacekit] Re: Support Kit Classes in the SK team repository
- » [interfacekit] Re: Support Kit Classes in the SK team repository
- » [interfacekit] Re: Support Kit Classes in the SK team repository
- » [interfacekit] Re: Support Kit Classes in the SK team repository
- » [interfacekit] Re: Support Kit Classes in the SK team repository
- » [interfacekit] Re: Support Kit Classes in the SK team repository
- » [interfacekit] Re: Support Kit Classes in the SK team repository
- [interfacekit] Re: Support Kit Classes in the SK team repository
- From: Ingo Weinhold