[interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:23:48 +0100 CET
"Adi Oanca" <adioanca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > "Adi Oanca" <adioanca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > I wouldn't spend too much work on that right now, at least
> > > > don't
> > > > care
> > > > about all the tiny details - I think this will be made easier
> > > > in
> > > > OpenBeOS sooner or later (because of a more advanced VM API).
> > > Who's developing the new VM (+API) ?
> > We'll see. I guess it'll be me who takes the lose ends that are
> > there
> > right now, since I need it soon :-)
> > All API changes will remain private for R1, though - but that
> > doesn't
> > forbid system internal use.
> Didn't Michael worked on a VM? in CVS: src/kernel/vm2
> What happened? What wrong with: src/kernel/core/vm?
> Tell us, what is left to do on the kernel?
Although that discussion doesn't belong on this list altogether:
Michael has written VM2 yes, but that one is not integrated with our
kernel yet. As I haven't had a deep look into it, though, I can't tell
you much about it anyway.
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- From: Adi Oanca
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- » [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- [interfacekit] Re: Status Updates
- From: Adi Oanca