[interfacekit] Re: Some progress in Support Kit ...
- From: "Erik Jakowatz" <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:55:42 -0800
They both achieve the same purpose -- serializing data. I suppose the
BArchivable interface is a bit more heavy weight because you have to
deal with loading your data into a BMessage, whereas with BFlattenable,
you're just writing to a buffer. So I guess BArchivable would be the
"smart" interface, and BFlattenable is the "dumb" interface. =)
e
>I didn't get the chance to read a lot about BFlattenable and
BArchivable,
>but I don't really understand the big difference between the two. Each
one
>seem to let the user to convert a class in a binary blob form, than can
be
>later (or elsewhere) reconverted in a real class instantiation.
>
>What is the big difference between the two ?
>
> (I know, the best is to read the docs, and I will ! I just want a
quick
>idea by people who have to deal with those classes ).
>
>- Steve
Data is not information, and information is not knowledge: knowledge is
not understanding, and understanding is not wisdom.
- Philip Adams
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: Some progress in Support Kit ...
- From: Steve Vallee
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Some progress in Support Kit ...
- From: Steve Vallee
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Some progress in Support Kit ...
- » [interfacekit] Re: Some progress in Support Kit ...
- » [interfacekit] Re: Some progress in Support Kit ...
- » [interfacekit] Re: Some progress in Support Kit ...
- » [interfacekit] Re: Some progress in Support Kit ...
- [interfacekit] Re: Some progress in Support Kit ...
- From: Steve Vallee
- [interfacekit] Re: Some progress in Support Kit ...
- From: Steve Vallee