[interfacekit] Re: Reproducing... bug ?
- From: "Erik Jakowatz" <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: svallee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:15:59 -0800
Do both and #ifdef them. I think we'll need to do some "field tests" to
determine whether or not we can make the improvement. I would like to
see it work correctly if we aren't going to break a bunch of apps by
doing it. I have a hunch that BMemoryIO is not a widely used class.
Any other thoughts, folks?
e
>I'm currently doing full testing on my code, and realized there's a bug
(or
>non-implemented) method. It's the Seek() of BMemoryIO. It *always*
return 0,
>and do absolutely nothing, whatever the parameter we give. So as the
>function is supposed to move the current pointer in the Memory IO, do I
..
>
>1) Emulate the *exact* behavior of the original Seek ...
>
>2) Implement it as it's supposed to be, because anyway no applications
sould
>have used it before especially because of it's bug...
>
>What do I choose in that kind of situation ?
>
>Thanks a lot !
>Steve
Data is not information, and information is not knowledge: knowledge is
not understanding, and understanding is not wisdom.
- Philip Adams
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: Reproducing... bug ?
- From: Steve Vallee
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Re: Reproducing... bug ?
- » [interfacekit] Re: Reproducing... bug ?
- » [interfacekit] Re: Reproducing... bug ?
- [interfacekit] Re: Reproducing... bug ?
- From: Steve Vallee