[interfacekit] Re: Ready, set, go!
- From: "Graham Gilmore" <grahamg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:48:59 -0500
>I have a thread aware cppunit ready which I think we can use to perform
>tests which need more than one thread (like testing BLocker for
>instance). Check out:
>
>http://www.windswept-iv.ca/openbeos/CppUnit.zip
>Do people think the mechanism is OK? I tried to make the
>ThreadedTestSuite as integrated and consistent with the current CppUnit
>as possible. The only thing I don't like is modelling each thread
>within a single multithreaded test as individual tests. It is a bit of
>a stretch, but it was very natural from a code and interface
>standpoint.
>
>Feedback is welcome. If people think this is a good interface for
>doing threaded tests, I will start changing my existing tests using
>this library. Thanks.
Hi Jeremy,
I was reading the README (or docs, or whatever it was) for CppUnit, and
it's derived from JUnit, a test suite for Java. In the notes it says
that one of the things they left out was a threaded test case. You
might want to take a look at the original JUnit and see what they did
(not that I'm saying what you've done is bad at all; heck, I haven't
looked at either version yet :)
Graham
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Ready, set, go!
- From: Jeremy Rand
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Ready, set, go!
- » [interfacekit] Re: Ready, set, go!
- » [interfacekit] Re: Ready, set, go!
- » [interfacekit] Re: Ready, set, go!
- » [interfacekit] Re: Ready, set, go!
- » [interfacekit] Re: Ready, set, go!
- » [interfacekit] Re: Ready, set, go!
- » [interfacekit] Re: Ready, set, go!
- » [interfacekit] Re: Ready, set, go!
- [interfacekit] Re: Ready, set, go!
- From: Jeremy Rand