[interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- From: Erik Jakowatz <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:19:24 -0800
My reading of the recent mail of Diane's is that the BMessage source is
actually included *in* app_server, thus negating the need to link to
libbe.so. No reason whatsoever we couldn't do the same thing with
BRegion which, in any case, should be as fast as we can make it.
e
DarkWyrm wrote:
>
> >One reason using libbe.so would be awfully useful, far as I
> >can see as of today (with very limited functionality in my "hack"
> >yet, but still) is to benefit from BRegion: how the app_server
> >does w/o this class is a mystery to me; maybe they've duplicated
> >the routines... This has to be the most critical bottleneck
> >class I've encountered so far in my "hacking" sessions.
> This has been something I've been contemplating myself, and I came to the
> same conclusion. It already has its own version of BMessage. It wouldn't
> surprise me if it also had a lightweight version of BRegion or something.
> Here's the real question: if we use a Region-type class, what would be
> required to make it as fast as possible?
>
> --DW
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] BListView
- From: Ulrich Wimböck
- [interfacekit] BeLite
- From: DarkWyrm
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- From: Cedric Degea
- [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- From: DarkWyrm
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- [interfacekit] BListView
- From: Ulrich Wimböck
- [interfacekit] BeLite
- From: DarkWyrm
- [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- From: Cedric Degea
- [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- From: DarkWyrm