[interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- From: "Cedric Degea" <cdegea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 23:00:16 +0100
>>>As Dianne said recently most messaing to the app_server is
>>>not BMEssage based, however. Though you'd entitled to answer
>>>by pointing out that this paprticular kind of message (CREATE_APP)
>>>is not a bottleneck/CPU-intensive one.
>>I saw this kind of usage done in AtheOS and I thought it might be
>useful.
>>What would you suggest? Obviously, this is not my area of expertise.
>
>Well, for the particular example you're giving, you could do it the
hard
>way:
[snip, sorry!]
Sounds quite good to my untrained eyes (though a bit of
practice those last two months probably help me have a
not-all-that-blurry picture). And a class like this would
be even more necessary for the more CPU-intensive drawing
primitives too, of course.
--
http://cdegea.free.fr/ | BeDev E-16870
"One thing to rule them all" -- UserFriendly.org, 20011021
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- From: Erik Jakowatz
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- » [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- [interfacekit] Re: Port Messaging
- From: Erik Jakowatz