On 2002-12-06 at 15:59:45 [+0100], you wrote: > > It looks like this is still my quick and dirty implementation. Wasn't > there one by Isaac (?) that till now apparently nobody felt responsible > for to check in? D'oh! I missed that =) Anyway, had your implementation something bad that there was the need to rewrite it? BTW, we should really do some tests for it =)