[interfacekit] One-thread-per-window
- From: DarkWyrm <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 16:46:53 -0400
With all the feature talk on the OBOS list, I've been thinking, which
some might consider dangerous. ;) One of the biggest complaints from
developers that I've heard is the one-thread-per-window concept and forced
multithreading.
How difficult would it be to provide an alternative to this but still
keep the regular API at the same time? I mean like a couple extra classes in
the Interface Kit which would utilize the same thread used by the
BApplication class instead of starting their own, possibly being coupled with
a special BApplication class. Then again, would this be a wise idea to do so?
--DW
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: One-thread-per-window
- From: Erik Jakowatz
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Server Tasks
- From: Erik Jakowatz
- [interfacekit] Re: Server Tasks
- From: DarkWyrm
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] One-thread-per-window
- » [interfacekit] Re: One-thread-per-window
- [interfacekit] Re: One-thread-per-window
- From: Erik Jakowatz
- [interfacekit] Re: Server Tasks
- From: Erik Jakowatz
- [interfacekit] Re: Server Tasks
- From: DarkWyrm