>Thanks Jack for checking in the fix. My computer is repaired so I am >back up and running and hope I don't introduce another bug like this in >the future. Glad to hear you're back in action. =) >I am also using 2.9-beos-991026 from R5. What is the official version >of the compiler we should be using? If I should be using gcc from >geekgadgets, I can do that. The R5 version of gcc is what we are "officially" using. Although there has been discussion, there's been no move to use anything else. Yet. ;) e >>On 2002-09-19 at 22:39:58 [+0200], you wrote: >> >>> Fascinating. The file compiles fine for me. I use the standard R5 >>> compiler (2.9-beos-991026), and it doesn't treat these as errors >(not >>> even as warnings), although it should, of course. >> >>Maybe this could explain the arcanum. My compiler is >>2.9-beos-000224 from geekgadgets. >> >>-- >>Qui e' Jack Burton, del Pork-Chop Express, >>che parla a chiunque sia in ascolto... >> >>http://digilander.iol.it/burton666/index.html > >-- >Jeremy Rand >jrand@xxxxxxxx Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. -William Pitt, British prime-minister (1759-1806)