[interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:44:47 +0200 CEST
"DarkWyrm" <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > How so? They're all in the same place.
> > Yes, but when something is defined in GraphicsDefs.h I would start
> > searching for a file named GraphicsDefs.cpp and expect to find it
> > there.
> You know what's funny? I know part of the reason I originally plunked
> them all in the same file was because I was continually not
> remembering
> which definitions were in GraphicsDefs and which ones were in
> InterfaceDefs. At the same time, the GraphicsDefs.cpp vs
> GraphicsDefs.h
> thing is also perfectly sensible. IMO, six of one, a half-dozen of
> another. :D
Ah well :-)
> > Ah, when we do that we could take the opportunity and separate them
> > as well ;-)
> If you really think it's something that should be done, sure. :)
Sure, but that's just me :)
I like to mirror header files with source files with the same base
name; it makes finding stuff generally easier IMO.
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- From: DarkWyrm
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- From: DarkWyrm