[interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 19:23:17 +0200 CEST
"DarkWyrm" <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Okay, I'll put it in there. Altough I'd like it more to have
> > InterfaceDefs.cpp and GraphicsDefs.cpp separated from each other; I
> > think that makes it easier to find when someone is searching for
> > them.
> How so? They're all in the same place.
Yes, but when something is defined in GraphicsDefs.h I would start
searching for a file named GraphicsDefs.cpp and expect to find it
there.
> > Out of curiosity: what convention put Globals.cpp in place? :)
> The Laziness convention. :D I can't exactly remember why ATM but IIRC
> it was an easy place to put all the globals mentioned in the headers
> because if it wasn't a regular class, it could be found there. It
> does
> need some general commenting and sorting so that we know where
> they're
> all declared, though.
Ah, when we do that we could take the opportunity and separate them as
well ;-)
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- From: DarkWyrm
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- From: DarkWyrm
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- » [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- From: DarkWyrm
- [interfacekit] Re: Missing stuff from GraphicsDefs.h
- From: DarkWyrm