[interfacekit] Re: I'm baaaaaack!
- From: "DarkWyrm" <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 19:26:58 -0400 EDT
> > Regarding the "app_server bitmap threads, etc." discussion: I
> > agree
> > that the current architecture leaves something to be desired.
> > However,
> > it is a tested design, so my feeling is that we should stick with
> > it for
> > the time being and leave rearchitecting that until R2. Whatever
> > scheme
> > we end up using in the long run, any change worth implementing is
> > going
> > to require *tons* of work to prototype and validate. I share
> > Ingo's
> > feeling in not wanting to wait another two years to see R1 ship. =P
>
> Actually there won't be *tons* of work to implement the scheme we
> agreed
> on. I think DW will do that with no problems :-).
Yup. BBitmapUtils won't be very time-consuming to implement because I
already *have* to implement code to do the very same thing that it'll
do on the server side in order to make BViews operate on BBitmaps. I
wouldn't have even thought of the idea in the first place if I'd
thought it'd be a lot of work. I is a *lazy* programmer. :D
--DW
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: I'm baaaaaack!
- From: Adi Oanca
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] I'm baaaaaack!
- » [interfacekit] Re: I'm baaaaaack!
- » [interfacekit] Re: I'm baaaaaack!
- » [interfacekit] Re: I'm baaaaaack!
- » [interfacekit] Re: I'm baaaaaack!
- » [interfacekit] Re: I'm baaaaaack!
- » [interfacekit] Re: I'm baaaaaack!
- » [interfacekit] Re: I'm baaaaaack!
- » [interfacekit] Re: I'm baaaaaack!
- » [interfacekit] Re: I'm baaaaaack!
- [interfacekit] Re: I'm baaaaaack!
- From: Adi Oanca