[interfacekit] Re: Hook functions + work done
- From: "Erik Jakowatz" <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:10:06 -0700
Fun flies when you're doin' time (a favorite of my father that I will
probably repeat eternally now that I am a father myself ;). Seriously
though, sorry about the drop out, guys. Between work and my ISP
folding, staying on top of stuff has been a nightmare.
There is reasonably good news, however. Work has mellowed considerably
over the beginning of this week; we may actually ship not only on time,
but also without any (known) issues and a with a few extra features that
were originally scheduled for the next point release. Yay for us!
Additionally, my DSL is scheduled to get re-connected (via a new ISP) on
the 12th. Now if I can just get NetworkSolutions to let me move my
domain hosting ... =[
I've also managed to find a little time to ponder the nature of
app_server/interface kit communication (look for something written about
this in the near future) as well as doing some more serious work on the
true nature of BArchivable, along with instantiate_object & co. It's
still in progress, but I may actually check some stuff in under testing:
once I'm finished with it (another night or two of work, I figure), it
will likely be an excellent unit test for our replacement code. So I'm
happy about that anyway. Now onto some overdue replies.
> OK, so when I said I'd be able to bang out the hook functions, I
had no
>idea that it would be as big a task as it has been. I know Yuri and
Erik have
Heh. I had a feeling it would end up being hairy. Haven't done a lot
of what you'd call straight to the metal graphics programming though, so
I thought I'd keep quiet. ;)
>able to. I *think* I've gotten the basic setup stuff done. Don't quote
me on
>that, though. ;)
What does this consist of, exactly?
> Next on the list I'd say would be fleshing out the non-accelerated
hook
>functions and begin the *real* work - layers, windows, and so forth.
It's
>probably a wise idea for us to get something to see before we
experiment with
>doing the code to allow us to drop our test server in for a "let's plug
it in
>and see what happens just for the heck of it." If you guys want the
code (I
>fixed the crash-and-burn bug BTW), I'll send it to you or post it to my
WWW
>site, but I still don't think it's quite worth it to upload it to the
server
>yet. It's at the point where it's fun to toy with, though. :)
Yes, please do post it (don't send -- I'm still hating life on a 28K
connection), I'm extremely interested to see what you've got happening.
e
Data is not information, and information is not knowledge: knowledge is
not understanding, and understanding is not wisdom.
- Philip Adams
- References:
- [interfacekit] Hook functions + work done
- From: DarkWyrm
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Hook functions + work done
- » [interfacekit] Re: Hook functions + work done
- [interfacekit] Hook functions + work done
- From: DarkWyrm