[interfacekit] Re: Holy hexdumps, Batman!
- From: "Erik Jakowatz" <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 19:22:49 -0800
Cool! But hold that thought. I'm not sure of the legality of using
disassemblies in our development; let me run it by Michael before
anybody starts going crazy with this.
e
>Guess what, guys? I think I've struck gold again! Anyone feel like a
listing
>of the API used in the R5 app_server, down to member function calls?
I've got
>it. :P
>
>I don't know if any of you have heard of it, but whilst I was just
piddling
>around the WWW, I ran across a native BeOS disassembler called RevEng
and
>decided to see if it was anything useful. As it turns out, it was
extremely
>so. Although the disassembly was rather large (17MB), the symbol table
it
>generated is *very* interesting. So is libbe.
>
>Maybe I'm just blowing smoke and sparks over something that may not be
>significant, but this might be just the thing we need for black boxes,
like
>the registrar.
>
>http://reveng.cjb.net/
>
>--DW
Data is not information, and information is not knowledge: knowledge is
not understanding, and understanding is not wisdom.
- Philip Adams
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: Holy hexdumps, Batman!
- From: DarkWyrm
- References:
- [interfacekit] Holy hexdumps, Batman!
- From: DarkWyrm
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Holy hexdumps, Batman!
- » [interfacekit] Re: Holy hexdumps, Batman!
- » [interfacekit] Re: Holy hexdumps, Batman!
- » [interfacekit] Re: Holy hexdumps, Batman!
- » [interfacekit] Re: Holy hexdumps, Batman!
- [interfacekit] Re: Holy hexdumps, Batman!
- From: DarkWyrm
- [interfacekit] Holy hexdumps, Batman!
- From: DarkWyrm