[interfacekit] Re: Header issues
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:13:40 +0100 CET
"Marcus Overhagen" <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Fortunately, there are not many classes with a missing destructor.
> Unfortunately, BFont has a problem.
Dano's BFont used a UseModernFonts() call to tell BFont that you know
about the destructor - not really nice, though.
I think we better keep R5 compatibility and redo this for R2 when we'll
switch to gcc 3 (and provide a new set of libraries).
Adios...
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: Header issues
- From: DarkWyrm
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Header issues
- From: Marcus Overhagen
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Header issues
- » [interfacekit] Re: Header issues
- » [interfacekit] Re: Header issues
- » [interfacekit] Re: Header issues
- » [interfacekit] Re: Header issues
- » [interfacekit] Re: Header issues
- [interfacekit] Re: Header issues
- From: DarkWyrm
- [interfacekit] Re: Header issues
- From: Marcus Overhagen