[interfacekit] Re: [Fwd: Re: Application Kit Tech Lead]
- From: "Erik Jakowatz" <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 20:38:40 -0800
>>I'm glad you brought this stuff up (formatting interface specs)
because
>>I'm currently wrestling with this myself. I've been reimplementing
>My suggestion is to use doxygen. It is a neat piece of software, runs
Yes, certainly doxygen, doc++ or ccdoc would seem to be the way to go.
I haven't *used* any of these tools; I have, however, seen plenty of
docs generated with them. They all seem to look the same and,
unfortunately, I don't like it. =( I much prefer the structure of the
online BeBook -- call me old-fashioned, but I like the book-like layout.
Is doxygen flexible enough to generate that kind of layout?
>I've mostly finished the print_server now. There are some things left
>to do, but most of it is working :) I can use it to print, and it works
>with the existing libbe.so and Printers preference panel :) I've
Very cool.
>documented the code using the BeIDE addon that is in CVS, but going to
>update the comments to doxygen style. I also want to include my "R&D"
>text files, so I'll see how that can be done best using doxygen.
I need to grab that addon and see if I can't adapt it for Eddie.
>Reusing BeBook material is a tricky thing, we come back to our initial
>"will the laywers let us do this" thing. BeBook content is property of
>Be, Inc I'm afraid..... But ok, I'm not to bothered about that, can't
>imagine Palm sueing us over that :)
Yeah, I'm not going to worry about it at this point. I would be
*stunned* if Palm came after an open-source project that was trying to
replicate a piece of software they weren't even bothering to keep alive.
;P
>Extraction of docs could be part of the build process, just another
>target in the makefiles :) That's what's done most and I think that
>would be pretty usefull....
>Doxygen could even be run within the "build farm" thing on sourceforge,
>so it could generate new docs for use on the website every night
>automagicly if we want :)
This would be ideal.
>PS: I'm evangelising on BeShare now-and-then, sometimes showing the
>link to the website, hope you don't mind :)
Not at all. =)
e
Data is not information, and information is not knowledge: knowledge is
not understanding, and understanding is not wisdom.
- Philip Adams
- References:
- [interfacekit] [Fwd: Re: Application Kit Tech Lead]
- From: Erik Jakowatz
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] [Fwd: Re: Application Kit Tech Lead]
- » [interfacekit] Re: [Fwd: Re: Application Kit Tech Lead]
- [interfacekit] [Fwd: Re: Application Kit Tech Lead]
- From: Erik Jakowatz