[interfacekit] Re: [Fwd: Message submitted to 'interfacekit']

why am I getting this from you?

Confuised.
alan


On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 04:37:41PM -0700, Erik Jaesler wrote:
> 
> Yes, having similar functions bottleneck through a single function is
> really the best way for maintainability and correctness.
> 
> If we are -really- concerned about performance, we can inline the
> 'stubby' functions in the header.
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:31:04PM +0200, Jack Burton wrote:
>   >
>   > Hi all.
>   > I hope you all won't be upset by another question :)
>   > I'm approaching the completion of BString (some methods are well tested,
>   > other aren't, and a pair aren't implemented, but it will be in short
> time),=
>   >
>   > and I was wondering.... Often I have some function which are similar,
> for
>   > example:
>   >
>   > 1. Prepend(const char *string)
>   >
>   > and
>   >
>   > 2. Prepend(const BString &string).
>   >
>   > These functions call a private utility function (_DoPrepend),
>   > but I am thinking if it would be better for the (2) to just call the
> first
>   > (i.e.
>   >
>   > Prepend(const BString &string)
>   > {
>   > =09Prepend(string.String());
>   > }
>   >
>   > Yes, this mean a little performance loss, but it would have the
> undubious
>   > vantage that there would be less code =3D=3D less bugs.
>   > Anyway, this is just an example, and I would be glad if someone took a
>   > moment and threw a look to our BString implementation, to understand
> what I=
>   >
>   > am saying.
>   >
>   > Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> // eompost 3DA6097C:5A67.1:vagresnprxvg
> 
> 
>

Other related posts: