[interfacekit] Re: Fwd: BAutolock

> > > And also in the BDirectWindow code I sent to Marcus (Marcus? Still around 
> > > ?).
> > Yes, you can checkin that code if you want. But the reverse engineered 
> > commuication
> > headers should better be renamed to something like R5_Session.h and put 
> > into the
> > headers/private/interface directory.
> 
> Should I remove the current DirectWindow implementation ? I guess a diff 
> isn't useful at all in that case...
No, please do not remove it. When you try to remove it and add a new file, CVS 
will detect that
and convert it into a diff. Just checkin the changes

> And for the header... can I use the R5 one ? I'm still unsure of the legal 
> implication of using R5 headers... can anyone explain ?
Please revert the CVS DirectWindow.h header to revision 1.3. 
We already have had an R5 header here, that was taken from 
the public BeOS headers that Be distributed on their ftp.

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/open-beos/current/headers/os/game/DirectWindow.h

Marcus

Other related posts: