[interfacekit] Re: Fwd: BAutolock

From: "burton666@xxxxxxxxx" <burton666@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "interfacekit" <interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:57:15 +0200

> > And also in the BDirectWindow code I sent to Marcus (Marcus? Still around 
> > ?).
> Yes, you can checkin that code if you want. But the reverse engineered 
> commuication
> headers should better be renamed to something like R5_Session.h and put into 
> the
> headers/private/interface directory.

Should I remove the current DirectWindow implementation ? I guess a diff isn't 
useful at all in that case...
And for the header... can I use the R5 one ? I'm still unsure of the legal 
implication of using R5 headers... can anyone explain ?

Follow-Ups:

[interfacekit] Re: Fwd: BAutolock
From: Marcus Overhagen

[interfacekit] Re: Fwd: BAutolock

Other related posts: