[interfacekit] Re: Fun with the registrar
- From: Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 20:58:58 -0800
> >Well, I have an updated cvs tree, but not entirely fresh; perhaps
> >that's the issue? I haven't done a full build (man, does it take
> >forever), but everything the tests and registrar depend on have been
> >built.
> Nope. I've got a bleeding-edge copy of the tree and as far as I can
> tell the registrar builds - and this includes utilizing jam with
> Axel's kernel build patch.
Same here. The copy I've been using (fresh circa the end of Marcus'
header exploits and updated as of a little less than a week ago or so)
and a completely fresh copy I just checked out both build and test just
fine (by which I mean that the tests run, not that they all pass :).
-Tyler
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Missing header build problems
- From: DarkWyrm
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Fun with the registrar
- From: DarkWyrm
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Fun with the registrar
- » [interfacekit] Re: Fun with the registrar
- » [interfacekit] Re: Fun with the registrar
- » [interfacekit] Re: Fun with the registrar
- » [interfacekit] Re: Fun with the registrar
- » [interfacekit] Re: Fun with the registrar
- » [interfacekit] Re: Fun with the registrar
- » [interfacekit] Re: Fun with the registrar
- » [interfacekit] Re: Fun with the registrar
- [interfacekit] Missing header build problems
- From: DarkWyrm
- [interfacekit] Re: Fun with the registrar
- From: DarkWyrm