[interfacekit] Re: FreeType2 and font cache

DarkWyrm wrote:
>>Yeah, DarkWyrm and I had talked about this previously.  Even the 
>>FreeType folks talk about implementing a cache for performance reasons. 
>> Still, if we hadn't already thought of it, this would be very valuable 
>>information. =)
>>
>>e
>>
> That reminds me. What *is* a font cache, anyway - is it merely just holding 
> fonts in memory so we don't have to load them from disk?

That's about the size of it.  The key, of course, is making it effecient. =)

e

Other related posts: