[interfacekit] Re: FreeType2 and font cache
- From: DarkWyrm <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 16:56:07 -0500
>Yeah, DarkWyrm and I had talked about this previously. Even the
>FreeType folks talk about implementing a cache for performance reasons.
> Still, if we hadn't already thought of it, this would be very valuable
>information. =)
>
>e
That reminds me. What *is* a font cache, anyway - is it merely just holding
fonts in memory so we don't have to load them from disk?
--DW
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: FreeType2 and font cache
- From: Erik Jakowatz
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Allocator blues
- From: Graham Gilmore
- [interfacekit] Good Proto5 news
- From: DarkWyrm
- [interfacekit] FreeType2 and font cache
- From: Steve Vallée
- [interfacekit] Re: FreeType2 and font cache
- From: Erik Jakowatz
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] FreeType2 and font cache
- » [interfacekit] Re: FreeType2 and font cache
- » [interfacekit] Re: FreeType2 and font cache
- » [interfacekit] Re: FreeType2 and font cache
- » [interfacekit] Re: FreeType2 and font cache
- » [interfacekit] Re: FreeType2 and font cache
- » [interfacekit] Re: FreeType2 and font cache
- [interfacekit] Re: FreeType2 and font cache
- From: Erik Jakowatz
- [interfacekit] Re: Allocator blues
- From: Graham Gilmore
- [interfacekit] Good Proto5 news
- From: DarkWyrm
- [interfacekit] FreeType2 and font cache
- From: Steve Vallée
- [interfacekit] Re: FreeType2 and font cache
- From: Erik Jakowatz