[interfacekit] Re: Extending BMessageQueue

Jeremy Rand wrote:

> I have no objections to adding an "IsLocked()" method to BMessageQueue.  
> It doesn't need to be virtual so there is no real risk of adding it 
> from a compatibility/FBC point of view (ie it won't take a valuable 
> place in the vtable).


I'm afraid I accidently checked a version in. =(  All it does is return 
fLocker.IsLocked().  Perhaps that a naive implementation, though.

> It would be very easy to implement and I can do it.  I am looking for a 
> copy of jam though so I can test it.  Seems like Ithmar had a site up 
> with an exec available but I can't seem to reach that site anymore.  If 
> someone can point me to a jam binary, I will get started on the 
> implementation.  Thanks.


I tried, vainly, to relocate the link I used to obtain my copy of jam, 
so I will post it on the IKTeam site shortly.

e

>>Does anyone (esp. Jeremy) object to my adding an IsLocked() method to 
>>BMessageQueue?  Jeremy, perhaps you'd rather add it yourself, as 
>>BMessageQueue is assigned to you?  I'm finding that its existence 
>>
> would 
> 
>>be helpful. =)
>>
>>e
>>
>>Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is 
>>
> the 
> 
>>argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
>>      -William Pitt, British prime-minister (1759-1806)
>>
> 
> --
> Jeremy Rand
> jrand@xxxxxxxx
> 
> 
>

Other related posts: