[interfacekit] Re: Extending BMessageQueue
- From: "Jeremy Rand" <jrand@xxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 23:58:26 EDT
I have no objections to adding an "IsLocked()" method to BMessageQueue.
It doesn't need to be virtual so there is no real risk of adding it
from a compatibility/FBC point of view (ie it won't take a valuable
place in the vtable).
It would be very easy to implement and I can do it. I am looking for a
copy of jam though so I can test it. Seems like Ithmar had a site up
with an exec available but I can't seem to reach that site anymore. If
someone can point me to a jam binary, I will get started on the
implementation. Thanks.
>Does anyone (esp. Jeremy) object to my adding an IsLocked() method to
>BMessageQueue? Jeremy, perhaps you'd rather add it yourself, as
>BMessageQueue is assigned to you? I'm finding that its existence
would
>be helpful. =)
>
>e
>
>Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is
the
>argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
> -William Pitt, British prime-minister (1759-1806)
--
Jeremy Rand
jrand@xxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: Extending BMessageQueue
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
- [interfacekit] Re: Extending BMessageQueue
- From: Erik Jaesler
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Extending BMessageQueue
- » [interfacekit] Re: Extending BMessageQueue
- » [interfacekit] Re: Extending BMessageQueue
- » [interfacekit] Re: Extending BMessageQueue
- » [interfacekit] Re: Extending BMessageQueue
- » [interfacekit] Re: Extending BMessageQueue
- » [interfacekit] Re: Extending BMessageQueue
- [interfacekit] Re: Extending BMessageQueue
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
- [interfacekit] Re: Extending BMessageQueue
- From: Erik Jaesler