[interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- From: DarkWyrm <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:11:24 -0500
I agree with Ingo. I have quite a number of reasons why I think we should at
least hold off on the server-side scrollbar. A special case adds time. I
don't want to sound indignant or anything (please don't take it as such), but
right now, Gabe and I have more than enough to do on the server without
adding to its complexity in another way. BScrollbar is also the only class
AFAIK which is handled by the server in any way except for displaying and
allocation.
Processor power is also quite cheap right now. While I do want the
possibility of running OBOS on an old166, I doubt that it will be the norm
with the way that Micro$oft's bloatware is forcing higher hardware
requirements. I doubt that the additional messaging overhead will be
significant, but if it is, it will likely be easier to go from client to
server than the other way around.
Minor customization is acceptable provided that it does not prove a
hinderance to the user. Alan made a good point in saying that the user should
not be restricted to a particular font, font size, or set of colors. One of
Microsoft's good ideas (there are so few!) was high contrast color schemes
for those who have visual disabilities of some sort. Localization support
will require different fonts, such as for Hebrew and other Middle East
languages or for C/J/K. As long as we are conservative about it, there
shouldn't be many problems.
--DW
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- From: Marc Flerackers
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- » [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- From: Marc Flerackers
- [interfacekit] Re: Course of action for BScrollBar implementation
- From: Ingo Weinhold