[interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- From: Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:33:30 +0200
On 2004-08-25 at 06:22:14 [+0200], Erik Jaesler wrote:
> >Thanks!
> >There are also some valid ToDo items in Message.cpp - while you're at
> >it... :-)
>
> Duly noted. =) Does anyone have a moment to explain how the
> multithreaded unit test stuff works? I need to put some tests together
> for sending messages back and forth between BLoopers.
I'm not sure about the multithreaded unit test framework. I remember
vaguely that I have used it for something, but I can't remember for what.
Anyway the BMessenger::SendMessage() tests may give you some inspiration
how one could test sending messages.
CU, Ingo
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- From: Erik Jaesler
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- From: Erik Jaesler