[interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:33:54 +0200 CEST
"Erik Jaesler" <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Thanks!
> >There are also some valid ToDo items in Message.cpp - while you're
> > at
> >it... :-)
> Duly noted. =) Does anyone have a moment to explain how the
> multithreaded unit test stuff works? I need to put some tests
> together
> for sending messages back and forth between BLoopers.
I've actually no idea about that - I hope Ingo comes to the rescue.
If you don't figure it out, I guess a standard-non-unit-test would be
okay for now, too.
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- From: Erik Jaesler
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- From: Erik Jaesler