[interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:28:36 +0200 CEST
"Erik Jaesler" <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, I've been testing with the code below, and I haven't found any
> crashes. I have found several bugs, however: a couple of memory
> leaks,
> and an incorrect index bounds check -- which shows up because the
> code
> below adds two items, and then tries to reference the third index
> (2).
> =) So good stuff there. I'm going to check the changes in and keep
> poking at it; please let me know if your crashes magically disappear.
> =)
Thanks!
There are also some valid ToDo items in Message.cpp - while you're at
it... :-)
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- From: Erik Jaesler
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- From: Erik Jaesler