[interfacekit] Broken BMessage
- From: Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Interface Kit <interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 23:45:33 +0200
Howdy,
is it possible that the current BMessage implementation is quite broken, or
do I miss some important prerequisite?
I'm in the process of cleaning up the Storage Kit code to run nicely on our
kernel and am experiencing the annoying situation that none of the Storage
Kit unit test that require communication with the registrar runs through;
all crash in some BMessage code (mostly in some evil template code called
by FindData(), but also in Unflatten()).
I was hoping to maybe even get the registrar running on our kernel, but
without working messaging that looks rather hopeless. :-(
CU, Ingo
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- From: Erik Jaesler
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- » [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [interfacekit] Re: Broken BMessage
- From: Erik Jaesler