[interfacekit] Re: _BWidthBuffer_

> > I don't have DANO and so I didn't test the class under it, but I 
> > think I'll remove those #if as soon as we agree on the version 
> > of the _width_table_ struct to use.
> 
> What do you think is the better one?
> 

I think the Dano one is better, because it stores a BFont in the table, instead 
of just its "FamilyAndStyle" and the "Size". Maybe it wastes a bit more space, 
but that way you can differentiate fonts also by spacing (a thing that it's not 
done in R5), or flags, or whatever else you want.

Other related posts: