[interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- From: "Marcus Overhagen" <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 00:25:45 GMT
"Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Adi Oanca <e2joseph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Also, never split the message into two port calls.
> > No. I'm sorry, I will never agree with you on this one!
>
> Can you elaborate a bit on why you don't do that?
> Doing 2 port writes of 1024 should be slower than doing 1 write of
> 2048, no matter if you need to allocate the memory (or part of it)
> first - and the problem should get worse the more parts the message
> will have.
Right, if you have a message that is larger than 1024 bytes,
you better chose 2048 or 4096 as static maximum chunk size.
Splitting and merging messages isn't a very good way.
If you really want to implement all the overhead of splitting and
merging messages, you better allocate a shared ring buffer in
memory, and avoid all the read_port/write_port calls.
This shouldn't be more complex then having the split/merge.
> The only upside that I can see is on low memory situations, where you
> cannot afford to allocate another 1024 bytes - but that seems very
> unlikely.
Except if you install my ethernet driver, which will allocate a 1.5 MB chunk
as send/revceive buffer :p
Marcus
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- [interfacekit] Re: BSession(NG)
- From: Axel Dörfler