[interfacekit] Re: BSession
- From: Adi Oanca <adioanca@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 01:18:08 +0300
Pahtz wrote:
Ok, I'm starting to like BSession.
I'm starting to hate BSession! :-))
I have another solution in mind, I think I'll post something next
week(maybe :-) - if I have time).
So we need it, but can we get rid of its flaws?
a) de-synchronization
b) having to drop messages that are bundled with one which we don't recognize
the 'what'
c) missing error return codes
Maybe with this... BSessionNG. :-)
Adi.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Lucram pentru tine. Analizam. Cautam zilnic.
Alegem ceea ce te intereseaza. Te anuntam.
http://www.REDUCERI.ro/
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: BSession
- From: Pahtz
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] BSession
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession
- » [interfacekit] Re: BSession
a) de-synchronization b) having to drop messages that are bundled with one which we don't recognize the 'what' c) missing error return codes
- [interfacekit] Re: BSession
- From: Pahtz