[interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- From: burton666 <burton666@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit <interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 13:59:43 +0200
> Well, as I said, it isn't so different to implement the needed functionality
> in BScreen or BPrivateScreen. So I would go with the Be approach.
Not that I am offering to write a working BPrivateScreen :P, since it requires
a person which does know the protocol to communicate with our app server ( I
guess it used _BAppServerLink_ in Be's implementation).
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- From: DarkWyrm
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- [interfacekit] Re: BScreen and BPrivateScreen
- From: DarkWyrm