[interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 19:35:43 +0200 CEST
"Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Not tested, but it should work safely AFAICT.
> Yep, looks good in principle, but it may have problems, since
> acquire_sem() is actually an acquire_sem_etc() with timeout. Which
> will
> cause the counter and the semaphore counter to get out of sync. As in
> BLocker I don't think it is possible to fix this (not without a
> further
> semaphore at least).
Indeed, the other safe way to do this would be using delete_sem() :-)
Perhaps we want to add a way to release all waiting threads from a
semaphore to release_sem(), by settings a magic release count (-1?) or
provide a special flag.
We could also find out how R5 solves this, if it does.
Adios...
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] BScreen (again)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- » [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [interfacekit] Re: BScreen (again)
- From: Ingo Weinhold