[interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- From: "Alan Ellis" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
I suppose we should also get rid of all the FBC padding in the classes
according to your argument, because after all, needing to add functions
and data to a class only 'may happen'.
Alan
>
> I see here the classic difference of opinion between programmers. If
> this discussion is to continue, people, please, come with something
> CONCRETE
> sustaining accessor mechanism. And, please, don't give just one or two
> examples, but, give me a rock solid argument, not like you did until now:
> "It MAY happen...".
>
>
> Adi.
>
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- From: Adi Oanca
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler
- [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- From: Adi Oanca
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- From: Adi Oanca
- [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler
- [interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow
- From: Adi Oanca