[interfacekit] Re: BRoster & BWindow

On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Adi Oanca wrote:

[...]
>     Guys, I do agree that the accessor mechanism is "a good idea", as Erik
> said, but, its not usefull ! As I see things, ALL the code written for
> accessors, is ALMOST in vain. I don't see much problems coming up, that, we
> actually have to resolve in accessor methods!
>
>     I see here the classic difference of opinion between programmers. If
> this discussion is to continue, people, please, come with something CONCRETE
> sustaining accessor mechanism. And, please, don't give just one or two
> examples, but, give me a rock solid argument, not like you did until now:
> "It MAY happen...".

I agree, that it seems we simply have different opinions about what would
be a better design, and I don't think, further discussion will help to
convince either side of the arguments of the other one. So, I guess the
conclusion is to let the chief decide. Erik?

CU, Ingo

Other related posts: