[interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- From: "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 20:33:22 +0200 CEST
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:19:00 +0200 CEST "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@pinc-
software.de> wrote:
> burton666 <burton666@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Should I commit the partial work that I have done ?
> > There are also some inline functions which work with
> > clipping_rects,
> > that
> > should be put in a private but "accessible" header (private/
> > interface
> > ?), since
> > I guess they can be interesting even for our app server.
>
> Sure!
>
> I am sorry I can't help you with your other questions, though :)
> But AFAICT we don't generally need to reproduce all friend functions
> -
> as long as they are only called privately in the Be libs. Dunno how
> it
> looks here.
Yes, please don't worry about those functions. Let's see what is needed
and implement only this (choosing better names would be nice).
Especially functions whose semantics is not completely clear don't make
any sense to be implemented.
CU, Ingo
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- » [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- [interfacekit] Re: BRegion
- From: Axel Dörfler