[interfacekit] Re: BLooper extensions

"Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > For the future, when we have something like the now often mentioned 
> > wait=3D5Ffor=3D5Fmultiple=3D5Fobjects(), I would prefer something 
> > like:
> > BLooper::AddPort(port id);
> Sounds good. Maybe can be even
>   BLooper::AddPort(port id, float priority =3D 0.5)
> if that can be supported.

That wouldn't really be necessary with wait_for_multiple_objects(), 
right?

> > along with an extended form of BLooper::GetMessageFromPort() which 
> > specifies the port number or something like this.
> Why would that be needed=3F Or do you intend it to be BLooper private
> =3F

As you obviously already realized, it could convert the incoming 
messages to real BMessages.

Adios...
   Axel.

Other related posts: