[interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- From: "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 12:37:38 +0200 CEST
Isaac Yonemoto <ityonemo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Also possibly useful would be a BLooper (descendant=3F) which allows
> you to
> execute code on a regular basis. The problem being that overriding
> the
> Run() function also kills the message processing routines, AFAIK.
>
> Unless the coder is expected to rebuild the message processing stuff
> in
> their Run() function.
Wouldn't one simply use BMessageRunners and execute the code when
receiving the respective message in MessageReceived()=3F
CU, Ingo
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- From: Isaac Yonemoto
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- From: Isaac Yonemoto