[interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 17:54:48 +0200 CEST
"Marcus Overhagen" <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > objects[1] =3D port;
> > objects[2] =3D semaphore;
> > objects[3] =3D file;
> > wait=5Ffor=5Fmultiple=5Fobjects(objects);
> Yes! Go for it. (But not in R1 please)
>
> As a temporary solution, I think the reading on multiple ports using
> timeouts
> is acceptable, but only if the API remains private.
I completely agree with you here!
Adios...
Axel.
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- From: Marcus Overhagen
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- » [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- [interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...
- From: Marcus Overhagen