[interfacekit] Re: BLooper - PLEASE look at...

"Adi Oanca" <e2joseph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> http://students.infoiasi.ro/~joseph/BLooperR.html
> 
> the first e-mail was not complete!!!
> 
> Please, start commenting after you have read BLooperR.html

The main disadvantage, the requirement for polling in BLooper, is 
caused by the design. Once introduced, we'll never be able to get rid 
of it (retaining source compatibility). Axel's idea to extend BLooper 
to deal with more than one port instead enables us to a) avoid polling 
in the current implementation in case there's only one port, and b) get 
rid of it completely as soon as we have kernel support for waiting for 
more than one port.

CU, Ingo

Other related posts: