[interfacekit] Re: Autolock (fwd)

From: "Waldemar Kornewald" <Waldemar.Kornewald@xxxxxx>
To: <interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:30:15 +0200

> I'm with Marcus on this issue.  BAutolock has one simple,
> clearly-defined purpose in life: scope-based lock management.  Let's
> keep it that way.  I'm all for Waldemar developing a more full-featured
> lock management class and placing it in a private header; we can put it
> through its paces in internal code to get it ready for *possible*
> introduction in the public API.

Okay, I will leave everything as it is and some day I will commit a template
"ObjectLocker".

Waldemar

References:

[interfacekit] Re: Autolock (fwd)
From: Marcus Overhagen

[interfacekit] Re: Autolock (fwd)
From: Erik Jaesler

[interfacekit] Re: Autolock (fwd)

Other related posts: