[interfacekit] Re: An idea
- From: DarkWyrm <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 07:05:07 -0400
>
>Why generate a whole new layer between each class? By doing so we will
>have twice the number of classes in the current InterfaceKit and 50% of
>them will be merely pointing back to an original class' functionality.
Actually, the idea isn't *every* class. If you look at, say, the BWindow
class has *9* other classes which are defined as friends. While I know that
they need access as such, having proxy classes is better OOP. They're not
very big. Think of them as more like a BWindowAccessor class.
--DW
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: An idea
- From: Erik Jakowatz
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: An idea
- From: Mark Tinderholt
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] An idea
- » [interfacekit] Re: An idea
- » [interfacekit] Re: An idea
- » [interfacekit] Re: An idea
- » [interfacekit] Re: An idea
- » [interfacekit] Re: An idea
- [interfacekit] Re: An idea
- From: Erik Jakowatz
- [interfacekit] Re: An idea
- From: Mark Tinderholt