[interfacekit] Re: :) Again - BBitmap

"burton666@xxxxxxxxx" <burton666@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ... client's side. But currently it's not available and won't be for 
> some time, 
> because before releasing a new API of that importance, we want to 
> clean 
> things up. Because once it's done, it's done. We have to stay 
> compatible 
> with it for a long time. "
> 
> In my opinion, we should stay as much close as possible at R5, at 
> least in 
> our first release.
> We chose the R5 design so we wouldn't have wasted time in design 
> work, 
> right ? 

Our idea was not to create a new API, but to stretch the existing BView 
API to suit our needs - IMO, that's a much much nicer way.

> An example of the desing time we could "waste" is represented by the 
> private storage api Ingo has implemented. Just look back at the time/
> work
> Ingo has put into them, since we weren't going to follow R5 design (I 
> can't
> say if it's been a good or bad decision, that's just a fact).

Yes, we gave him a hard time :-)
But I am sure it was worth it :))

Adios...
   Axel.

Other related posts: