[interfacekit] Re: AW: Ready, set, go!
- From: Erik Jakowatz <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:34:20 -0800
> Currently I'm already working on the BListView/BListItem/BOutlineListView.
Great! I'll update the site to show that you own these tasks.
> The BListItem
> is almost finished and also a lot of member functions of the BListView are
> implemtented.
Excellent!
> I took the BeBook as specification - I think the behaviour should not
> change.
Precisely what you should do. I'm encouraging people to just copy the
Be header files and make their modifications from there. Goes a long
way toward preserving binary compatibility.
> I haven't created the use cases yet (are they really neccessary for the
> BListView...).
Use cases suck to write, but they're really instrumental in making sure
you've written all the necessary test cases -- especially when it comes
to verifying failure modes. When I was implementing BArchivable, I was
*amazed* by how ungracefully it would fail when given bogus input (NULL
pointers, etc.). This is the kind of thing where we can easily improve
upon the existing library.
> Some things are not really clear at the moment:
What DarkWyrm said. =)
> At the moment I have to a little for some examinations but I'll go on in two
> weeks.
Good luck with your exams!
e
- References:
- [interfacekit] AW: Ready, set, go!
- From: Ulrich Wimböck
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] AW: Ready, set, go!
- » [interfacekit] Re: AW: Ready, set, go!
- » [interfacekit] Re: AW: Ready, set, go!
- [interfacekit] AW: Ready, set, go!
- From: Ulrich Wimböck