[interfacekit] Re: AW: Re: Wid-gits

As soon as I have the time, I'll study the question, and give you a
mini-report  :-)

- Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Jakowatz" <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:15 AM
Subject: [interfacekit] Re: AW: Re: Wid-gits


>
> What's the return on investment?  I.e., what does Unicode 3.0 get us
> that Unicode 2.0 won't, and how much more effort will it take?  3.0 is
> worth examining regardless, if only to architect 2.0 support in such a
> way as to make a later update to 3.0 as painless as possible.
>
> e
>
> Steve Vallee wrote:
> > Yes, the Unicode 2.0 book, and found a document on the web about the
> > (upcoming?) 3.0
> >
> > Now, a little question: is it worth to support 3.0 for OBOS R1, or I
just
> > put the time for 2.0 and will upgrade it for GE ?
> >
> > - Steve
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Staffan Hellström" <staffan.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:15 PM
> > Subject: [interfacekit] Re: AW: Re: Wid-gits
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>I have access to the Unicode 2.0 Standard book too, although you
probably
> >>
> > bought it too.
> >
> >>At 16:07 2002-02-14 -0800, you wrote:
> >>
> >>>>There is a project called ICU. It is an open source project
> >>>>initiated by IBM. It is published under the X license. It
> >>>>converts different character encodings. I don't know how good the
> >>>>documentation is, but I think it is woth to take a look at it.
> >>>>
> >>>Thanks ! that'll help me for sure, and just bought two books to fill
the
> >>>holes ... ;-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>- Steve
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Other related posts: